Dead Cat Marketing

Sup­pose your busi­ness sells some­thing to a cus­tomer.  Fol­low­ing the sale, you gather no infor­ma­tion about them.  Instead you send the cus­tomer out the door and off into the uni­verse, hop­ing they will come back again some­day.  In the time that fol­lows, you make no direct or indi­rect attempt to deter­mine if the cus­tomer is happy with the level of ser­vice pro­vided, feels good about the pur­chase, would be inclined to come back or will tell oth­ers about good things about you.  In this sce­nario you have a cus­tomer that poten­tially exists in mul­ti­ple states.  Happy? Angry? Loyal? Prof­itable? Vocal? Dis­sat­is­fied? Dis­gusted? Dis­en­gaged com­pletely?  You can the­o­rize about it, but you don’t really know until they come back again.  In this sce­nario, you are engag­ing in dead cat marketing.

Dead cat?”  “What the heck are you talk­ing about dead cats for?”  To answer that, we travel back to 1935, where Aus­trian physi­cist Erwin Schroedinger cre­ated a hypo­thet­i­cal exper­i­ment now known as Schroedinger’s Cat.  It used the fol­low­ing construct:

“A cat is penned up in a steel cham­ber, along with the fol­low­ing dia­bol­i­cal device (which must be secured against inter­fer­ence from the cat) : in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioac­tive sub­stance, so small that per­haps in the course of one hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal prob­a­bil­ity, per­haps none [will decay]; if it hap­pens, the counter tube dis­charges and through a relay releases a ham­mer which shat­ters a small flask of hydrochlo­ric acid.  If one has left this entire sys­tem to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if mean­while no atom has decayed.  The first atomic decay would have poi­soned it”

In short if  the device trig­gered the ham­mer, the cat is dead.  If the device did not yet trig­ger the ham­mer, the cat is alive.  To the out­side observer, the cat exists in mul­ti­ple states.  The cat can be con­sid­ered to both alive and dead.  You can not know until you open the box.  Schroedinger was using this exper­i­ment as a way to debate quan­tum physics.  Since I  know noth­ing about quan­tum physics, I will instead use anal­ogy to share what I think this means to Mar­ket­ing.   Here goes…

deadcatboxIn the box, the cat was either very alive or very dead.  The observer’s uncer­tainty did not truly dic­tate that out­come.  It sim­ply pre­vented the observer from know­ing.  The same holds true of your cus­tomers.  Whether you choose to ask them or not, they have an opin­ion.  They may hate you, they may love you.  You can spec­u­late all you want, but until you lis­ten you can not be cer­tain.  Until you are cer­tain, or at least have some prob­a­bil­ity of cer­tainty, you can’t do much to improve.

Good mar­ket­ing requires you to “open the box.”   Unlike the cat exper­i­ment, chances are that the out­come with cus­tomers is not an absolute.  Rather than dead cat or liv­ing cat, cus­tomers are likely on more of a con­tin­uum — from very happy to very unhappy cus­tomers.  You need to ask, observe, mea­sure, and… then actu­ally do some­thing to alter the out­come where appro­pri­ate and able.   The beauty of the social web, search, rss, email, online sur­veys and other tools we now have, are they make the box very easy to open.  Peo­ple are already out there talk­ing, you just need to make the effort to listen.

While Schroedinger’s cat, if found dead, could not come back to life, open­ing the box and lis­ten­ing to your cus­tomers can bring new life to your business.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to Dead Cat Marketing

  1. Geoff D November 20, 2009 at 8:51 pm #

    Dave,

    I think that you have hit the nail (or cat) on this one. You have once again taken a very dif­fi­cult con­cept of physics, explained it well, and found a mar­ket­ing par­al­lel. Allow me to draw another par­al­lel and play devil’s advocate.

    Another prin­ci­ple of quan­tum physics is that of Heisenberg’s Uncer­tainty. Roughly stated, Heisen­berg cor­rectly pos­tu­lated that one can­not know both the veloc­ity (momen­tum) and posi­tion of a par­ti­cle. You may know one or the other with absolute pre­ci­sion, but never both. What’s more, is the harder that you try, your meth­ods for mea­sur­ing the unknown will only intro­duce more inaccuracy.

    Now I’ll attempt to draw two par­al­lels, one to Schroedinger and one to Heisen­berg. Using the cat is the cus­tomer anal­ogy, the first inter­ac­tion between busi­ness and the cus­tomer could kill the cat (cus­tomer has a neg­a­tive response) or release it unscathed (cus­tomer has a pos­i­tive response). That first impres­sion deter­mines the out­come, but unlike Schroedinger’s exper­i­ment, the out­comes aren’t always so clear cut. As you men­tion, if the out­come is not so absolute, your com­pany may need to peek inside the box.

    But be care­ful. Try to know too much about the cat and you may intro­duce more uncer­tainty. Try to tweak things too much and your com­pany may sec­ond guess itself or dis­il­lu­sion the cus­tomer. Prob­a­bil­ity plays a big role in quan­tum physics and (I assume) in mar­ket­ing. It is the abil­ity of good com­pa­nies to use this infor­ma­tion to hit the mark. Those that use the infor­ma­tion wisely and to their advan­tage with­out being too intru­sive usu­ally end up on top.

  2. Chad November 20, 2009 at 9:18 pm #

    I love it… thanks Geoff and Dave for a great read and insight.

  3. davidebowman November 22, 2009 at 8:23 pm #

    Geoff,

    Great com­ment. I think I will take a look at Heisen­berg and try to write a fol­low up post in the next few days.

  4. Geoff D September 5, 2010 at 1:20 pm #

    Dave,

    I again thought of your post and Schroedinger’s prin­ci­ple today while rid­ing my bike. Though not at all related to mar­ket­ing, while rid­ing I passed a shut, rather pris­tine look­ing, card­board box on the James Island Con­nec­tor. I thought, “I won­der what’s in that box?” It could’ve been empty, filled with use­less stuff, or some­thing that I really wanted. At that moment (at least to me) its con­tents simul­ta­ne­ously existed and did not. It was a com­pletely empty pack­age or one that con­tained a mil­lion dol­lars; nei­ther of which (and both) would exist until I opened the box. I con­tem­plated going back and open­ing it, and I would have had it not been such a busy and dan­ger­ous road. Now I feel as if I am the “cat” inside Shroedinger’s box.

    The box still resides on the James Island Con­nec­tor or it doesn’t, and yet it is both. Had I opened it, would things in my life be any dif­fer­ent? Might I be a mil­lion­aire? Might the box have con­tained a bomb (like the mani­a­cal ham­mer in the story)? Do I exist now or, in a par­al­lel uni­verse, where I was blown up after open­ing the box, did I cease to exist?

    All stuff that I think about while mind­lessly spin­ning (and the sub­ject of a future blog post).

Leave a Reply